Friday, November 21, 2025

The Life of William Bradford


William Bradford was the governor of Plymouth for over 30 years and he wrote the most significant history of the colony’s founding, Of Plymouth Plantation. He led the colony with skill and wisdom and he recorded its story for future generations. He was in the best place to write a history, for he had been part of the Pilgrim story from the beginning, and he played a leading part in their lives in the new world. As one biographer has put it, “To [William Bradford], as to most Puritan historians, the writing of history was in the nature of a sacred obligation, for it was the recording of God’s providence as it worked itself out in human affairs” (Perry D. Westbrook, William Bradford). 

Bradford had seen God’s mercy and power at work in the lives of the Pilgrims, as well as in his own life. In some ways, Bradford was an unexpected instrument. He had been weak, despised, and suffering before he came to strength and leadership and prominence. And yet, in these ways, God had providentially prepared him for his calling and blessed the whole colony with a wise and godly magistrate who knew where they came from and where they intended to go. 

Early Life in England

At the end of his life, he wrote a poem about his life. It begins,
From my years young in days of youth,
God did make known to me his truth,
And call'd me from my native place
For to enjoy the means of grace
In wilderness he did me guide,
And in strange lands for me provide.
In fears and wants, through weal and woe,
As pilgrim passed I to and fro…
William Bradford was born in 1590 (1589 O.S.) in Austerfield, Yorkshire, baptized on March 19th. His early years were filled with loss. In 1591, his father died. In 1594 his mother remarried and William was sent to live with his grandfather. In 1596 his grandfather died, and William returned to his mother. In 1597 his mother died and he was sent to be cared for by his uncles, Robert and Thomas. By this point, he was only 7.

William was from a line of yeoman farmers, and his uncles put him to the work of herding sheep. But during this time, William was afflicted by a long sickness. He later saw this as providentially keeping him from the vanities of youth and preparing him for what was to come. It led him to read more, books like Foxe’s Book of Martyrs, Erasmus’ The Praise of Folly, and the Geneva Bible.

The reading of Scripture at about 12 years of age made a strong impression on him, and he became known as a Puritan, enjoying the ministry of Richard Clifton, a Puritan minister in the established church a few miles away in Babworth. As Cotton Mather later said of Bradford: “Nor could the wrath of his uncles, nor the scoff of his neighbors, now turned upon him, as one of the Puritans, divert him from his pious inclinations” (Magnalia Christi Americana). Bradford also met William Brewster, of nearby Scrooby, who became a mentor and father figure to him (Brewster was 23 years older than Bradford).

As a teenage, Bradford studied the question of whether it was right to remain in the parish assembly or whether he should join a separatist congregation that practiced God’s ordinances in their purity. He decided that he must separate, and did so, despite the rage of his friends. Perhaps he first joined the separatist congregation in Gainsborough, but then he joined the closer one that formed in Scrooby, formally organized in 1606 with Richard Clifton as its pastor and John Robinson as its teacher (later William Brewster became its ruling elder).

This separatist congregation soon attracted the hostility of the authorities, and so they tried to leave England. Some of them were caught trying to leave in 1607 and imprisoned, including 17-year-old William Bradford. By 1608, he and the others had made it to the Netherlands.

Becoming an Adult in the Netherlands

In Amsterdam, William Bradford learned from and served a Frenchman in the working of silks. The French were rather skilled in the textile industry, and it was Huguenot refugees from France who later brought improvements to this industry to northern Ireland and elsewhere. William Bradford also enjoyed the fellowship and worship of the separatist church and moved in with the Brewster family and stayed with them until he got married in 1613.

After about two years in Amsterdam, the church moved to Leyden to avoid being drawn into conflicts in other separatist congregations. In Leyden, Bradford worked as a fustian-worker (a weaver of a heavy cotton-linen fabric used for men’s clothing). He knew many languages: English, Dutch, French, Latin, and Greek. Later in life, he also learned Hebrew to read the Old Testament in its original language.

In 1611, Bradford turned 21 and was able to receive his inheritance. He converted his estate into money and set himself up in Holland with a house and loom of his own. He also probably helped the church buy a building for a meeting space. In 1613, he married Dorothy May, the daughter of an elder of another separatist church. Their son John was born in 1617.

He and his wife joined the group that set out for the new world in 1620, leaving behind their 3-year-old son in the care of others until it was safer for him to come over.

Governor in Plymouth

When they arrived in the new land, William Bradford signed the Mayflower Compact and went on several expeditions to explore the land. On the first expedition, he was caught by a deer trap and hanged upside down until his friends were able to free him. Tragically, his first wife died by falling overboard while Bradford was away on one of these expeditions.

In that first winter he was struck with a great pain in his hip and collapsed, and it was thought he would not last the night. He was cared for by Captain Standish and Elder Brewster, two of only six or seven who remained well enough to care for the others. While Bradford was sick, the common house where he was staying caught fire, but he and the others in it escaped.

When Governor Carver died in April, the 31-year-old Bradford was unanimously chosen to be the new governor of the colony, even though he had not entirely recovered from his illness. He would be re-elected 31 times to one-year terms, serving as governor every year of his remaining life except for five. As Cotton Mather later remarked, “He had, with a laudable industry, been laying up a treasure of experiences, and he had now occasion to use it: indeed, nothing but an experienced man could have been suitable to the necessities of the people.”  

Marriage and Family

In 1623, William Bradford married a second time. His second wife was a widow with two children named Alice. It appears he had courted her by letter before she arrived, so that they married soon after her arrival. Their wedding was attended by Massasoit, his queen, four other kings, and 120 of his men. These guests also brought three or four bucks and a turkey for the feast. The colonists and Indians feasted together and the Indians danced for their English friends. William and Alice went on to have two sons and a daughter.

His Time as Governor

On aspect of being governor was maintain good foreign relations with the native tribes. Several examples can be produced from just his first year in office. He sent out a party to rescue Squanto from Corbitant, a Wampanoag sachem. He sent another party to establish the fur trade with the Massachusetts. He also made a show of strength when the Narragansetts sent a threatening message of arrows tied in a snakeskin. Bradford sent back powder and balls in that snakeskin with the message: “that if they had rather have warre then peace, they might begine when they would; they had done them no wrong, neither did they fear them, or should they find them unprovided.” He also enforced a policy of only obtaining lands from the Indians by voluntary purchase.

Bradford also had to deal with debt and property. Plymouth colony was originally organized as a joint-stock company. All property belonged to the company and was held in common. The distribution of property and debts had the potential to provoke jealousy in the colony. In 1622, when new comers arrived who did not share the burden of the company, Bradford wisely came up with an arrangement to keep the peace. In 1623, he consented to a division of the land and oversaw its distribution, so that each household could work its own land and simply pay a tax. In 1627, Bradford oversaw the end of the joint-stock company by the settlers purchasing the colony from the London merchants. Each “purchaser” received shares of the debt and a certain amount of land to own. To make repaying the debt easier, a group of 11 men (including Bradford) known as the “undertakers” took on the obligation to pay the colony’s debt and received a monopoly on trade with the Indians. The undertakers were also able to arrange for the transport of the remaining Leyden separatists. It took them 14 years to be free of the debt. Further skill was required for Bradford and his assistants to oversee the distribution of land to more newcomers and eventually to turn this power over from the original purchasers to all the freemen of the colony in 1641.

There were also troublesome men who had to be dealt with. The most serious threat came early on in 1623-1624 with the arrival of two men, the hypocritical minister John Lyford and the hotheaded John Oldham. They pretended friendship, but worked secretly to pit newcomers against the established leadership, and to pit those in England against the separatists in Plymouth. Bradford intercepted their slanderous letters to England and produced copies of them at the right time so that these men were exposed. Oldham had already mistreated Captain Standish, and when the letters were produced, Lyford was silenced while Oldham tried to lead an uprising. They were banished from the colony (they later learned that Lyford had a scandalous past that further exposed his wretched character).

Religion in the colony was another important matter. William Bradford rejoiced to hear of the downfall of the bishops in England during the time of the English Civil War. Yet he was distressed to see a rise in groups that followed errors. Late in life he wrote a poem on this theme, writing against the Familists, Ranters, Seekers, Levelers, Quakers, Anabaptists, Anti-Trinitarians, Arminians, Roman Catholics, and English Bishops, with an appeal to the Presbyterians to join with the Congregationalists in opposing these errors. Some of these groups even made it to his beloved Plymouth colony. While Plymouth colony was rather moderate compared to the other Puritan colonies with respect to church-state relations and in tolerating disagreement, Bradford knew that the governor was called to be a nursing father to the church and was to support and nourish religion. He had learned from the writings of Peter Martyr Vermigli that both tables of the law were committed to the power of the magistrate, who was to require the people to live well and virtuously. In 1645, a petition was presented to the General Court “To allow and maintaine full and free tolerance of religion to all men that would preserve the Civill peace”. Bradford argued against it and used his position as governor to keep the petition from coming to a vote. In 1655, he threatened to resign as governor unless the General Court took speedy action to “remedy the neglect of competent maintenance for the ministry and the failure to take measures for the suppression of error” (Langdon, Pilgrim Colony, p. 67). A law was passed that ensured a minister’s support by his congregants if they obstinately refused to fulfill their duty. In 1656, at the last General Court that Bradford attended, a Quaker was found guilty of disturbing public worship and of slander and was sentenced to be banished after the winter was over.

His Writings

Bradford had reason to be worried over the religious unity, orthodoxy, and piety of the colony, but not all his efforts were political. He also put pen to paper to leave behind a testimony for future generations.

Between 1630 and 1650, he wrote Of Plymouth Plantation. In this book, he traced the history of the colony from its beginnings in the congregation at Scrooby all the way to 1647, unto the praise of the Lord who had shown his mercy and power. This book remained unpublished, but it was used by other early historians of New England like Bradford’s nephew Nathaniel Morton, who copied portions from Bradford in his book New England’s Memorial. Bradford’s book was kept in Boston, taken by the British in 1776, and was rediscovered in London in 1855.

Bradford also wrote three “dialogues” (1648, 1652) to pass on the vision of the founders to the younger generation, as well as a number of other poems (1650-1657).

His Death

Finally, in 1657, after telling his friends of the comfort he had experienced from the Spirit, he died on May 9th, in the 69th year of his age. His He had done his part and he left the work to future generations.

We have reason to be thankful for what God did through William Bradford. We should also listen to Bradford’s history and exhortation as we press on in our day. 

His will and the inventory of his belongings (including many of his books) at his death can be found here. In his will, he wrote, "In speciall I Commend to you a little booke with a blacke cover wherin there is a word to Plymouth a word to Boston and a word to New England with sundry usefull verses". Here is the word to New England that he mentioned:
A Word to New England, by William Bradford

Oh New England, thou canst not boast;
Thy former glory thou hast lost.
When Hooker, Winthrop, Cotton died,
And many precious ones beside,
Thy beauty then it did decay,
And still doth languish more away.
Love, truth, goodness, mercy and grace—
Wealth and the world have took their place.
Thy open sins none can them hide:
Fraud, drunkenness, whoredom and pride.
The great oppressors slay the poor,
But whimsy errors they kill more.
Yet some thou hast which mourn and weep,
And their garments unspotted keep;
Who seek God's honor to maintain,
That true religion may remain.
These do invite, and sweetly call,
Each to other, and say to all;
Repent, amend, and turn to God,
That we may prevent his sharp rod.
Yet time thou hast; improve it well,
That God's presence may with ye dwell.

 

Wednesday, November 19, 2025

Pentecostal and Charismatic

The sixth denominational tradition we come to in this series is the Pentecostal and Charismatic tradition. The Charismatic movement of the mid-1900s came from the Pentecostal movement of the early 1900s, which in turn had developed from the Holiness movement in the Wesleyan tradition of the late 1800s. Pentecostals usually hold to many Wesleyan distinctives and have their own denominations. Charismatics are a broader and more diverse category and can be found within other denominations and non-denominational churches.

What is most distinctive of Pentecostal and Charismatic churches is the belief in and practice of speaking in tongues (or glossolalia) as a current manifestation of the baptism of the Holy Spirit. In general, Pentecostals will say that all those baptized in the Spirit will speak in tongues (differing among themselves whether this baptism is a first, second, or third work of grace), while Charismatics will say that some who are baptized in the Spirit will speak in tongues. Additionally, both are distinguished by a belief in and practice of gifts of prophecy and healing today. They are generally credo-baptist and premillennial.

A minority of Pentecostals (roughly 10%) are not Trinitarian. They are known as Oneness Pentecostals. One of the largest Oneness Pentecostal denominations is the United Pentecostal Church International (their headquarters is in Weldon Spring, MO and their college and seminary is in Wentzville, MO).

History

Noteworthy figures in this tradition include Charles Parham, William J. Seymour, Aimee Semple McPherson, Oral Roberts, Joel Osteen, Kenneth Copeland, Chuck Smith, John Hagee, and Paula White.

Charles Parham - He began as a Methodist minister. He opened Bethel Bible College in Topeka and in 1900 he and his students sought the baptism of the Spirit, expecting the gift of tongues as the sign of such baptism. Eventually, one of the students began to “speak in tongues” an hour before the new century after he laid hands on her. The experience spread. The college closed, and he moved around the region, establishing a Bible school in Houston in 1905. His influence declined after he was charged with sodomy in 1907.

William J. Seymour - He began as a student of Parham. He was called to pastor a Nazarene church in Los Angeles, which then rejected his teachings on the baptism of the Spirit (he had taught that those who had not spoken in tongues had not been baptized by the Spirit). As he led a small group that became the Apostolic Faith Gospel Mission, people began to speak in tongues, starting the Azusa Street Revival. It went on continually for three years, attracting many people who went out to spread the teaching and experience to the world.

Church of God - The Church of God denomination was founded gradually from 1886 to 1907 as a holiness church in the Southeast. Instances of speaking in tongues had occurred before the Azusa Street Revival, but it took on greater significance due to the influence of that revival and its teachings, and the Church of God became a Pentecostal denomination headquartered in Cleveland, TN. It has 9.2 million members worldwide and perhaps around 900,000 members in the USA. There are many related denominations with the same name or similar names, like the Church of God (Huntsville), the Church of God in Christ (with predominately African-American membership), and the Church of God of Prophecy.

Assemblies of God - The Assemblies of God was founded in 1914 in Hot Springs, AR by those in the Apostolic Faith Movement, Chicago Pentecostals, and CMA Pentecostals. Its headquarters is in Springfield, MO. Its General Council condemned Oneness Pentecostalism (e.g. UPCI) in 1916. It has a mixture of congregationalist and presbyterian government. Its four core beliefs are Salvation, Baptism in the Holy Spirit (tongues being the sign of it), Divine Healing, and the Second Coming of Christ, and it lists 16 doctrines in its Fundamental Truths.

International Church of the Foursquare Gospel (aka The Foursquare Church) - The Foursquare Church was founded as an evangelical Pentecostal denomination by Aimee Semple McPherson in 1923 in Los Angeles. The term refers to the “foursquare gospel” of Jesus as Savior, Healer, Baptizer with the Holy Spirit, and Soon Coming King. Before its founding, McPherson had been an evangelist in the Assemblies of God. She was a celebrity preacher that used mass media, led a mega church, and conducted faith healing demonstrations.

Oral Roberts - Oral Roberts is an example of a Charismatic televangelist. He promoted Prosperity Gospel theology and “seed-faith” - “planting a seed” by giving in faith, expecting a miracle. He was a minister in the Pentecostal Holiness Church (1936-1968) and then the United Methodist Church (1968-1987), and then independent (1987-2009). He founded Oral Roberts University in Tulsa, OK. Kenneth Copeland, Joel Osteen, and Ted Haggard attended Oral Roberts University.

Charismatic Movement - In the 1960s, Pentecostal ideas arose within existing denominations (e.g. Anglican, Methodist, Roman Catholic, etc) without necessarily causing people to leave them. And rather than equating the baptism of the Spirit to speaking in tongues, speaking in tongues was seen as just one gift of the Spirit.

Calvary Chapel - Calvary Chapel churches began with Calvary Chapel in Costa Mesa, CA led by Chuck Smith, which broke away from the Foursquare Church and became the hub of the “Jesus movement” (e.g. the Jesus people). They led the way in rock-style contemporary Christian music. They also emphasized verse by verse expository preaching. They hold to biblical inerrancy and evangelical theology while holding to the baptism of the Holy Spirit as a second experience, with tongues and prophecy as among the current gifts of the Spirit, to be carefully used. They do not ordain women. Their churches are basically independent and their pastors are not accountable to anyone but God. The Vineyard Movement sprung from a couple Calvary Chapel churches.

What We Have in Common

With many Pentecostals and Charismatics, such as those in the Assemblies of God and Calvary Chapel, we share a belief in the Trinity, Christ, inspiration of Scripture, sin, repentance and faith, and that we are saved by grace through faith on account of the death and resurrection of Christ. Most retain at least a basic practice of baptism and the Lord's supper. We can appreciate their zeal for evangelism and a recognition of the supernatural in a materialistic age.

Where We Differ

Some of these churches are very fringy, even cultish, especially those that emphasize prosperity gospel, faith healing, and unaccountable self-appointed leadership. Some of them simply do not preach the gospel, even if they do not explicitly reject it. Some Pentecostal churches (e.g. UPCI) are not Trinitarian, and are thus not Christian.

Even in the case of the better churches of this tradition, we differ with their distinctives concerning the baptism of the Holy Spirit and the continuing gifts of speaking in tongues, prophecy, and healing (although we do recognize God’s providence and his freedom to work with, against, above, and without means). We also differ with prosperity gospel teachings like seed-faith, word of faith, and the like.

Concerning Pentecost

The outpouring of the Spirit on Pentecost (Acts 2) inaugurated a new era, not a second work of grace in the life of the believer. It was a unique, transitional event. The Spirit was given in a new way, and going forward, this baptism of the Spirit would be received by all believers (1 Cor. 12:13). We are filled with the Spirit in our baptism by the Spirit, and continue to be filled with the Spirit.

The gift of tongues was given to the whole church on Pentecost, but after the initial outpouring, it was given as a gift to some members for the benefit of the church and a sign to unbelievers (1 Cor. 12, 14). It was the ability to speak foreign languages previously unknown to the speaker, not the free vocalization passed off as tongues speaking today.

The significance of speaking in many languages was that the new covenant church would include all nations. This was a joy to believing Jews, but it was a judgment against those who rejected the gospel (1 Cor. 14, Is. 28:11-12). The gift of tongues ceased after the apostolic age since it marked that period of transition and what it symbolized has been fulfilled. The church was established by the apostles among the nations, so that the church does speak the languages of the nations.

Another reason the gift of tongues has ceased is that the revelation of the gospel given through the apostles and prophets has been delivered to the church and is recorded in Scripture (Eph. 2:19-21, 3:5, Heb. 1:1-2, 2:1-4). Their work was accomplished, and so no additional revelation is given. Since revelation is complete, and speaking in tongues was a form of revelation from God, therefore speaking in tongues has ceased. Also, the “sign gifts” like the gift of healing, which confirmed the word being revealed, also ceased. 

I have written more about Pentecost, tongues, and the baptism of the Holy Spirit here:




Wednesday, November 12, 2025

Methodist and Holiness

The Methodist and Holiness tradition, the fifth denominational tradition in this series, originally developed as a renewal movement within the Anglican Church, emphasizing evangelism, conversion, practical religion, and holiness, with Arminian and “complete sanctification” distinctives. They prospered in the revivals of the 18th and 19th centuries, utilized methods like camp meetings, as well as lay preachers and circuit riders. They remained episcopal in government (with deacons, elder/minister, presiding elder/district superintendent, and bishop/superintendent).

(The Welsh Methodists remained Calvinist rather than Arminian, but they eventually became identified as a Presbyterian, and in America they merged with the PCUSA in 1920.)

History

John Wesley (1703-1791) and Charles Wesley (1707-1788)
  • Both were Anglican ministers in England.
  • Having begun a small club at Oxford, the “Holy Club,” and been challenged by German Pietists, they had heart-warming experiences in 1738 in which they became assured of their justification by faith.
  • In 1739 they began following George Whitefield’s example of preaching outdoors to crowds and an itinerant ministry. Yet, they disagreed with Whitefield concerning Calvinism (he was for it and they were against it).
  • While they formed societies that met for mutual encouragement and accountability, and approved lay preachers, they remained in the Church of England. The class meetings of their societies were additional to regular church services. Methodists in England only became distinct from the Church of England after John Wesley’s death.

Francis Asbury (1745-1816) and the Methodist Episcopal Church
  • Asbury was sent to America in 1771.
  • The Methodist Episcopal Church was founded in the USA in 1784, with its first ordained officers ordained by John Wesley. Its first two bishops were Thomas Coke and Francis Asbury.
  • Asbury worked tirelessly to lead the MEC and to spread the gospel to the west, traveling an average of 6,000 miles a year in his itinerant ministry.

Peter Cartwright (1785-1872) and the Second Great Awakening
  • Converted at a camp meeting in KY (1801), ordained by Asbury (1806), a presiding elder (1812).
  • The Second Great Awakening covered a series of revivals from 1800 through the 1830s. During this time, the Methodists experienced incredible growth, becoming the largest denomination in the USA in 1840.
  • Cartwright moved to Illinois and became the presiding elder of his district and remained an active circuit rider throughout his 400-mile long district.

Divisions

  • In 1816, the African Methodist Episcopal Church (AME) was organized by Richard Allen.
  • In 1830, the Methodist Protestant Church (MPC) was formed over the issue of lay representation.
  • In 1845, the Methodist Episcopal Church, South (MPCS) was formed due to a dispute over a bishop who owned slaves.

Related Groups and the Holiness Movement
  • The mid-1800s saw the rise of the holiness movement, a renewed emphasis and further development of the doctrine of complete sanctification in Methodism.
  • The Salvation Army began with the Booths in England in the late 1800s with an emphasis on street evangelism, help to the poor, and a military-style organization (without sacraments).
  • The Church of the Nazarene was formed in 1908 as the union of several holiness groups that had spun off the Methodist churches. It was strongly Wesleyan, allowed for women’s ordination, and dropped infant baptism.
  • The United Brethren were German pietists, similar to the Methodist but from a German background. Of the first two prominent leaders, one was Mennonite and the other was Reformed. 

United Methodist Church: its founding, its struggles, its division
  • In 1939, the MEC, MECS, and MPC reunited to form the Methodist Church.
  • In 1968, the Methodist Church united with the Evangelical United Brethren Church to form the United Methodist Church.
  • From 2019 to the present, the United Methodist Church has slowly divided, especially over the issue of sexual morality. Many conservative Methodist churches have left the UMC to form and join the Global Methodist Church, while others have simply become independent. 

What We Have in Common

With non-liberal Methodists, we Presbyterians have in common doctrines of God, Christ, Scripture, the moral law, original sin (at least theoretically), doctrine of justification (by faith alone, on account of Christ’s imputed righteousness alone, distinct but not separate from sanctification), infant baptism, and the sacraments as means of grace. While they are Arminian, their version of Arminianism is better on original sin and on justification than that of the early Arminians (the Remonstrants).

We can appreciate their zeal for evangelism and holiness, their doctrine of justification, and their lively hymns (although we often use them with a few minor edits).

Where We Differ

Our main differences with traditional Methodism are with its:
  • Wesleyan Arminianism (their belief in general prevenient grace, their denial of unconditional election, limited atonement, irresistible grace, and the perseverance of the saints).
  • Complete sanctification (their teaching to expect it by faith, as you are, and now).
  • Church government (their government is generally episcopal).
  • General tendency to downplay doctrine and overplay or misuse experience.
  • Tendency to impose extra-biblical impositions for holiness (e.g. abstinence from alcohol).
Scripture speaks of total depravity as a practical reality, only overcome by God's effectual calling of his elect (John 6:44-45, 8:46-47, 10:26, Rom. 8:7-9), not something weakened by prevenient grace (the idea that God gives grace to everyone enabling them to believe if they so choose). 

While God does sanctify those whom he justifies, delivering us from the dominion of sin, we do not simply receive complete sanctification by faith at any given point in this life. God works through us, renewing us more and more to holiness, in a process that begins at conversion and continues all this life (1 Cor. 7:1, 1 Peter 2:11, Rom. 7, Phil. 3:12).

Of course, with liberal Methodists, we have many more differences. 

Wednesday, November 5, 2025

Baptist

In this series on denominational traditions, we have thus far looked at the Reformed and Presbyterian, Anglican and Episcopal, and Congregationalist denominations. Today we come to the Baptists.

Overview
 
The Baptist tradition is a more radical congregationalism that rejects infant baptism. 
  • Baptists hold to church membership on the basis of conversion, gathered churches formed by church covenants, church government by the congregation, and the autonomy of the local church (sometimes in associations).
  • Baptists hold to the baptism of believers only and baptism by immersion only, and a stronger contrast between the Old and New Testaments than is held by Presbyterians.
  • Baptists also generally support a greater separation of church and state than the other groups covered thus far.
  • Baptists are divided on the issue of Calvinism vs. Arminianism (or, in their terms, Particular Baptists vs. General Baptists). While Particular Baptists (holding to the five points of Calvinism) were more prevalent in the past, General Baptists are more common today.

History


Notable Baptists include Thomas Helwys, Roger Williams, John Bunyan, Benjamin Keach, Isaac Backus, John Leland, John Gano, Adoniram Judson, James Boyce, Charles Spurgeon, Billy Graham, Martin Luther King Jr., W.A. Criswell, Al Mohler, and Rick Warren.

Their relation to the Anabaptists of the 1500s is contested, both inside and outside Baptist circles. While perhaps inspired by, or manifesting similar tendencies as, the Anabaptists, the Baptists originated as a branch of English Puritan Congregationalism in the early 1600s.

Origins in the early 1600s.

1609 - A group of English separatists in Amsterdam under the leadership of John Smyth and Thomas Helwys repudiated their previous baptisms and were baptized upon profession of faith. They also adopted Arminian beliefs and became known as General Baptists. They adopted a confession in 1612. While Symth went on to seek membership among the Anabaptists, Helwys led a group back to England.

1630s - The first Particular Baptist church is founded, in London.

1638 - Roger Williams founds the first Baptist church in the colonies, in Providence, RI. Soon after, John Clarke founds a Baptist church in Newport, RI, securing a charter for RI in 1663.

1641 - A Particular Baptist church in England begins the practice of baptism by immersion.

Growth and maturation in 17th century England.

1644 - The 1st London Baptist Confession is written. Baptists increase and enjoy more freedom during the interregnum under Cromwell.

1653 - John Bunyan is (re)baptized by immersion after his conversion. By 1655 he was preaching. He would become one of the most famous Baptist preachers and writers, especially due to his book, Pilgrims Progress.

1677/1689 - The 2nd London Baptist Confession (2LBC) is written and published, based on the Savoy Declaration, which was based on the Westminster Confession.

Baptists in America: growth in the Awakenings, disestablishment, and westward expansion.

1665 - The First Baptist Church of Boston is established.

Late 1690s - Some Baptists from Maine move to Charleston, SC, founding the first Baptist church in the South.

1742 - The Philadelphia Confession of Faith (the 2LBC with two additional chapters) is adopted by the Philadelphia Association. 

1730s-1740s - Baptists increase during the Great Awakening. A number of northern Baptist preachers start Baptist churches in VA and NC in the wake of the Great Awakening, such as former Congregationalists John Leland (MA), Shubal Stearns (MA), Daniel Marshall (CT), and former Presbyterian John Gano (NJ).

1789-1840 - Baptists experience much greater growth amid the disestablishment of Anglican and Congregationalist churches, the Second Great Awakening, and westward expansion.

Formation of denominations

1814 - The Triennial Convention is founded, especially for the sake of cooperation for missions (its full name was the General Missionary Convention of the Baptist Denomination in the United States of America for Foreign Missions). Its founding was prompted by appeals from Adoniram and Ann Judson, missionaries who had switched from Congregationalist to Baptist on their voyage to the mission field.

1833 - The New Hampshire Confession of Faith is written by Rev. John Newton Brown and agreed upon by the Triennial Convention.

1845 - Due to a dispute over slavery (whether slave-owners could be appointed as missionaries, which also impacted the ability to support missionaries in the South), Baptist churches in the South left the Triennial Convention and formed the Southern Baptist Convention.

1865 - Following the Civil War, many Black Baptists form their own churches and associations.

1895 - The National Baptist Convention, USA is founded by representatives of three African-American Baptist conventions (in 1961, a group split off this group called the Progressive National Baptist Convention).

1907 - The Triennial Convention is reorganized as the Northern Baptist Convention (it was later renamed American Baptist Churches USA in 1972).

1925 - The Southern Baptist Convention adopt the Baptist Faith and Message (a revision of the New Hampshire Confession of Faith). The SBC currently (2024) has 46,876 churches and a little over 12.7 million members, making it the largest Protestant denomination in the USA.

Other Baptist associations and traditions developed in the 1800s, such as Regular Baptists, Primitive Baptists, Missionary Baptists, Free Will Baptists, General Baptists, and Independent Fundamentalist Baptists.

The conservative resurgence in the SBC.

Beginning around 1979, after growing concern about the direction of the denomination, there was a conservative resurgence in the Southern Baptist Convention, with strategic and successful efforts to elect conservatives and bring back denominational boards, agencies, and seminaries from liberalism. Issues included biblical inerrancy and opposition to abortion and women’s ordination. The Baptist Faith and Message was revised in 2000, including a complementarian statement on the family and statements opposing homosexuality and abortion.

What We Have in Common

As a comparison of the Westminster Confession of Faith and the 2nd London Baptist Confession shows, Baptists can have much in common with Presbyterians. In that comparison, we share the same doctrines of Scripture, God, God’s sovereignty, the five points of Calvinism, creation, providence, Christ, his benefits, faith, good works, assurance of salvation, the law of God, worship and the sabbath, the Lord’s Supper, the state of the dead, and the resurrection and last judgment.

But Baptists are diverse, and some do not hold all these things in common with us. Many today are Arminian, dispensational, pre-millennial, memorialist with regard to the Lord’s Supper, not very sabbatarian, and sometimes antinomian. Yet, even these Baptists will hold at least to the “five fundamentals” and the Trinity and justification by faith alone and Scripture alone. Also, some Baptists are liberal and have very little in common with us.

In general, we can appreciate Baptists for being evangelical and zealous, eager to maintain Biblical authority and the fundamentals of the faith and to spread the gospel.

Where We Differ

If we are comparing the WCF and 2LBC, the main differences have to do with covenant theology, church and church government, and baptism. There are also differences regarding civil government (omitting the maintenance of piety from the duties listed in paragraph 2, omitting paragraph 3, and rewriting the 4th in the chapter on civil government) and marriage (omitting one end of marriage - the increase of the church).

And so, in addition to the differences we would have with Congregationalists about church membership and government and the autonomy of the local church, we would also differ with the Baptists on the continuity of Old and New Testaments, and the mode, meaning, and subjects of baptism. Also, Baptists, like later Congregationalists, hold to only two offices: elder/pastor and deacon, rather than a threefold division of teaching elders, ruling elders, and deacon.

Baptists hold a variety of views on the covenants. They generally deny that the old covenant was an administration of the covenant of grace and would equate the covenant of grace with the new covenant (the more covenantal Baptists would say that the new covenant was progressively revealed in the Old Testament and was the only way anyone was saved). They say that the new covenant is only made with regenerate believers, and that the infants of believers were never included as such in the covenant of grace. But this does not do justice to the unity of God’s covenant with his people in the Old Testament or the continuity between the testaments and the people of God.

Baptists hold to the necessity of baptism by total immersion, while Presbyterians believe that total immersion is not necessary, but that the essential thing is washing with water, and that pouring or sprinkling is lawful, sufficient, and most expedient.

The 2LBC omitted "the solemn admission of the party baptized into the visible church" from the meaning of baptism (following Savoy), as well as it being "a sign and seal of the covenant of grace," but did add that it is a sign of fellowship with Christ, in his death and resurrection. The Baptist Faith and Message, following the New Hampshire Confession, adds that baptism is a prerequisite to the privileges of church membership and the Lord’s Supper, and that baptism is “an act of obedience symbolizing the believer’s faith” (as well as the believer’s spiritual death, burial, and resurrection). But describing the sacraments as “acts of obedience” makes as much sense as describing the gospel an “act of obedience.” Both are given by God to us, to be received by us. The sacraments are the gospel made visible, signs of Christ and his benefits.

Baptists would insist that only professing believers be baptized. “Those who do actually profess repentance towards God, faith in, and obedience to, our Lord Jesus Christ, are the only proper subjects of this ordinance” (2LBC). The way many would say it today is that baptism is a public declaration of an inward transformation. Most would say that baptisms of the unregenerate are invalid, so that if a person came to realize they were converted after their baptism they should be baptized again. But these positions remove the visible objectivity of the sacrament, downplay its function as a sign from God to man, and neglect God’s consistent inclusion of the children of believers in the administration of his covenant (Gen. 17, Deut. 29, Acts 2:38-39, 16:31-34, see more here).